It's one of the greatest stories never told. Though it is true, and perhaps because it is true, you will not hear it in any news reports or read about it in most history textbooks. It is never mentioned by any modern politician, in any political party, at any level of local or national leadership. The silence is deafening.
Let's begin with a question. What did our
great nation’s original states say about the Christian faith in their
founding documents? What did they require of their lawmakers religiously?
You haven’t heard? You don't know? Get ready for a surprise.
Andrew Schwartz wrote the
following article, from which I will quote directly. Using a broad definition of
the term “Christian,” he has compiled this information from the state constitutions
of our nation’s foundational thirteen colonies.
If you have not seen
this before, probably neither have others in your family and in your circle of influence. They likely do not realize how the nation began and what the colonies once required of their
lawmakers. Consider forwarding this link to them so that they will be informed. Now get ready. Here's the shocking news you've never heard. Pass it on!
---
Delaware—1776—On legislators’
required oath of office: Delaware is explicitly Christian, requiring an oath or
affirmation of faith in the Trinity and acknowledging the divine inspiration of
Holy Scripture—both the Old and New Testaments. Article 22 reads, “I, A B. do profess
faith in God the Father, and in Jesus Christ His only Son, and in the Holy
Ghost, one God, blessed for evermore; and I do acknowledge the holy scriptures
of the Old and New Testament to be given by divine inspiration.”
Pennsylvania—1776—On legislators’
required oath of office: Similar to Delaware, Pennsylvania requires an oath
unto God (although leaving out the trinitarian formula) and the acknowledgement of the divine nature of Holy Scripture.
Pennsylvania uniquely affirms God as the consummate governor, reminding
lawmakers of their due submission unto him and his word. Section 10 reads, “I
do believe in one God, the creator and governor of the universe, the rewarder
of the good and the punisher of the wicked. And I do acknowledge the Scriptures
of the Old and New Testament to be given by Divine inspiration.”
New Jersey—1776—On qualifications for
legislative office: New Jersey goes a step beyond Pennsylvania, requiring not
simply a profession of faith in God as part of the universal church, but more
specifically a belief in any Protestant sect, in order to meet the requirements
for public office, as well as to be protected in their civil rights. Article 19
reads,
[T]here shall be no
establishment of any one religious sect in this Province, in preference to
another; and that no Protestant inhabitant of this Colony shall be denied the
enjoyment of any civil right merely on account of his religious principles;
but that all persons, professing a belief in the faith of any Protestant sect
who shall demean themselves peaceably under the government, as hereby
established, shall be capable of being elected into any office of profit or
trust, or being a member of either branch of the Legislature, and shall fully
and freely enjoy every privilege and immunity, enjoyed by others their fellow
subjects.
Georgia—1777—On qualifications for
legislative office: Georgia, too, explicitly required Christian Protestantism
as a staple for public office. Article 6 states, “The representatives… shall be
of the Protestant religion, and of the age of twenty-one years, and shall be
possessed in their own right of two hundred and fifty acres of land, or some
property to the amount of two hundred and fifty pounds.”
Connecticut—1818—On preference of
worship and civil rights: Connecticut guarantees religious liberty for “any
christian sect,” and guarantees equal rights,
powers, and privileges for “each and every society or denomination of
christians.” But it does not guarantee religious liberty, nor even equal rights
and treatment,
to non-Christians in the state. Article 1.4 reads, “No preference shall be
given by law to any christian sect or mode of worship.” And Article 7.1 says,
“each and every
society or denomination of christians in this state, shall have and enjoy the
same and equal powers, rights and privileges.”
Massachusetts—1780—On religious rights:
Like Connecticut, Massachusetts establishes equal protection of the law only
for denominations of Christians. Likewise, those who did not profess
Christianity were disqualified from public office. Part 1, Article 3 states,
“every denomination of Christians, demeaning themselves peaceably, and as good
subjects of the commonwealth, shall be equally under the protection of the law:
and no subordination of any one sect or denomination to an other shall
ever be established by law.” Part 2, Chapter 2, Article 2 declares, “no person
shall be eligible to this office [of governor]… unless he shall declare himself
to be of the Christian religion.” Lastly, Part 2, Chapter 6, Article 1
proclaims, “Any person chosen governor, lieutenant-governor, councillor,
senator, or representative…shall…make and subscribe the following declaration,
viz.: ‘I, A.B., do declare that I believe in the Christian religion, and have a
firm persuasion of its truth…”
Maryland—1776—On religious liberty:
Though historically Roman Catholic in culture, the state of Maryland
generalized its protection of religious liberty to those “professing the
Christian religion,” but did not grant that same protection to those who did
not make the same profession. Declaration of Rights, 33 reads, “That, as it is
the duty of every man to worship God in such manner as he thinks most
acceptable to him; all persons, professing the Christian religion, are equally
entitled to protection in their religious liberty… the Legislature may, in
their discretion, lay a general and equal tax for the support of the Christian
religion.”
South Carolina—1778—On the establishment
of a religion: South Carolina is as explicitly Christian as any of the original
states. The introduction below speaks for itself, but the entire resolution in
Article 38 is even more prescriptive in its state Christianity. Article 38
declares,
“[A]ll persons and
religious societies who acknowledge that there is one God, and a future state
of rewards and punishments, and that God is publicly to be worshipped, shall be
freely tolerated. The Christian Protestant religion shall be deemed, and is hereby
constituted and declared to be, the established religion of this State. That
all denominations of Christian Protestants in this State, demeaning themselves
peaceably and faithfully, shall enjoy equal religious and civil privileges.”
New Hampshire—1792—On the support of
religion for the security of government: New Hampshire again sponsors equal
protection of the law, but only for denominations of Christians. New Hampshire
also grounds its civil and moral philosophies on evangelical [i.e., gospel]
principles, and authorizes the legislature publicly to support only “protestant
teachers of piety, religion and morality.” Article 6 states,
As morality and piety,
rightly grounded on evangelical principles, will give the best and greatest
security to government, and will lay in the hearts of men the strongest
obligations to due subjection; and as a knowledge of these is most likely to be
propagated through a society by the institution of the public worship of the
Deity, and of public instruction in morality and religion; therefore, to
promote those important purposes the people of this State have a right to
empower, and do hereby fully empower, the legislature to authorize, from time
to time, the several towns, parishes, bodies corporate, or religious societies
within this State, to make adequate provisions, at their own expense, for the
support and maintenance of public protestant teachers of piety, religion, and
morality…[E]very denomination of Christians, demeaning themselves quietly and
as good subjects of the State, shall be equally under the protection of the
law.
New Hampshire is
explicitly Protestant Christian and evangelical (Christian gospel), and it does
not authorize the legislature to support non-Christian religions.
Virginia—1776—On religious liberty:
Virginia is the first state on our list (in state order) that does not
explicitly make itself a Christian state. While it does apply an obligation of
religion to “our Creator,” it also goes out of its way to place “reason and
conviction” and “the dictates of conscience” as the governors of that duty. One
can infer an implicit call to Christianity at best in the Declaration of
Rights. Section 16 reads, “it is the mutual duty of all to practice Christian
forbearance, love, and charity towards each other.” We can conclude that this
was not explicitly Christian.
New York—1776—On religious liberty:
Similar to Virginia, New York protects religious liberty, while never calling
for a Christian preference in worship or establishment. It does briefly allude
to traditionally Christian virtues, but also calls the state to guard against
“the bigotry of weak and wicked priests,” and calls Christian preference
“repugnant to this constitution.” New York was explicitly not a Christian
state. Article 38 reads, “this convention doth further, in the name and by the
authority of the good people of this State, ordain, determine, and declare,
that the free exercise and enjoyment of religious profession and worship,
without discrimination or preference, shall forever hereafter be allowed,
within this State, to all mankind: Provided, That the liberty of conscience,
hereby granted, shall not be so construed as to excuse acts of licentiousness,
or justify practices inconsistent with the peace or safety of this State.”
North Carolina—1776—On qualifications for
office: While not as explicitly establishmentarian as her Southern Sister,
North Carolina similarly holds Protestant Christianity in legal preference,
requiring its affirmation for public office. Article 32 states, “That no
person, who shall deny the being of God or the truth of the Protestant
religion, or the divine authority either of the Old or New Testaments, or who
shall hold religious principles incompatible with the freedom and safety of the
State, shall be capable of holding any office or place of trust or profit in
the civil department within this State.”
Rhode Island—1843—On religious liberty:
Rhode Island, our thirteenth state, is a strange case, since it didn’t formally
adopt a constitution until 1843. Their charter of 1663 is explicitly Christian,
and they were technically governed by this charter even after independence in
1776, but it is questionable whether that religious governance was in practice
or in name only. In its 1843 constitution, it turned decidedly a-Christian,
requiring no religious test for public office, and speaking only of a general
God, rather than a Christian or Protestant God. Article 1.3, Section 3 states,
We, therefore, declare
that no man shall be compelled to frequent or to support any religious worship,
place, or ministry whatever, except in fulfillment of his own voluntary
contract; nor enforced, restrained, molested, or burdened in his body or goods;
nor disqualified from holding any office; nor otherwise suffer on account of
his religious belief; and that every man shall be free to worship God according
to the dictates of his own conscience, and to profess and by argument to
maintain his opinion in matters of religion; and that the same shall in no wise
diminish, enlarge, or affect his civil capacity.
So, of the thirteen
original states to ratify the Constitution, ten states were indisputably and
explicitly Christian states either at the time of ratification, or shortly
thereafter. Hypothetically, had they bullied their position, they as states
could have amended the federal Constitution to provide equal protection only to
Christians, and required adherence to Christianity as a qualification for
office.
---
Again, my sincere thanks to Andrew Schwartz for compiling and publishing this vital information. Let us not merely bemoan what once was. Let us show up, stand up, and speak up for what one day may be!
