Sunday, November 03, 2013

Christ and Christmas: Fact, Fiction, Faith, and Feeling


It’s often called “the most wonderful time of the year,” and with good reason. I love the holiday season. It's all special to me: the giving and receiving, the time with family and friends, and of course the food! I am thankful whenever and wherever any truth about Jesus Christ is recognized. He was born of a virgin in Bethlehem, as a matter of historical fact, and He is King of kings, Lord of lords!

As this time approaches each year, I feel the need to respond to questions that people have asked me about Christ and Christmas. There are so many different and confusing feelings, perspectives, and preferences. Sincere, precious people have been taught or led to believe conflicting things.

As people who try to stay as close to the Word as possible, we need to determine what the Bible does and does not teach. If we do not, then we may unintentionally perpetuate some misconceptions. This blog post seems to me a helpful way to address these matters.

I once met a man who told me that he was named after one of the "three wise men." It happened at Groot Drakenstein Correctional Centre, in the Western Cape of South Africa. This former prison is famous for the fact that Nelson Mandela spent the last three of his 27 years of his incarceration there. At a youth retreat where I spoke in 2010, after the prison had been transformed into a type of lodge for group gatherings, I met the caretaker. He told me confidently, “You know my name because it is in the Bible. My name is Melchior. I go by ‘Mel.’ I am named after one of the three wise men who came to see Jesus.”

The name “Melchior” and the number "three" are not in the Bible.

A friend of ours, when she was new to the church, told me, “I love the Bible story of the Little Drummer Boy who played his drums by the manger the night Jesus was born.”

That little drummer boy is not in the Bible, but just in a song.

A sister in Christ was surprised awhile back to see a note in her new study Bible that indicated correctly that the Magi (often called “Wise Men”) did not bring their gifts to Jesus on His actual birthday. They never came to the manger. Yet most “nativity scenes” place the Magi beside the manger on the same night He was born.

These Magi ("wise men") were not there on the night Jesus was born. These popular “nativity scenes” contradict what the Bible says.

Once a sister asked me, "Why doesn't 'our church' have a candlelight Christmas Eve service?" Others have asked, “I saw a Facebook post that said, ‘Happy Birthday, Jesus! – December 25.’ Is that Christ’s birthday? Are we wrong not to have a birthday party for Him?”

The Bible does not indicate the date of Jesus' birth. The early church did not celebrate it as a church event or have a birthday party, either on December 25 or on any other date.

I am always interested in knowing what the Bible actually teaches. What are the facts? And how did the various man-made traditions about this or that get started and become so widely accepted? Is it important for us to get the facts, as best we can, and to separate fact from fiction? Can we do so, while respecting individual feelings and opinions? I believe so. Are we nitpicking when we want to know every detail that we can? I think not.

When I discuss matters such as these I do not question anyone’s sincerity or honesty. There has to be value in seeking just to determine the objective truth. Opinions and feelings are, well, just that: opinions and feelings. I have mine; you have yours. If there are facts that correct my opinions, I want to know about them. I’d like to assume that other people feel the same way.

When it comes to Christ and Christmas, the discussion can be especially touchy. People have so many different emotions, backgrounds, and beliefs. Those who stick to facts can be seen as cold, or even as majoring in minors. We certainly don’t want to dampen anyone’s enthusiasm for the Lord or shout “Bah! Humbug!” to anyone who loves this special season. However, since we are investigating facts about Christ, we hope that our search regarding His birth has special value.

What are some of the facts?

● Fact: We do not know the number of the wise men, whether three or otherwise.

We only know that they brought three kinds of gifts – gold, frankincense, and myrrh.

● Fact: We do not know the names of the wise men.

It was much later that people assigned them the names Caspar or Gaspar, Melchior, and Balthazar. See below for a discussion of their origin.

● Fact: The Bible does not call these men “kings,” as in, “We Three Kings of Orient Are.”

The “Magi” (from which word we get “magic”) were a caste of Persian priests who observed the stars. They were not merely “wise men” in the sense of counselors or advisers. So where and how did these other ideas originate?

According to one source, “The Western tradition of the names of the Magi derive from an early-6th-Century Greek manuscript, translated into the Latin Excerpta Latina Barbari. The description seems to be of a mosaic of the magi, possibly those at Ravenna. A pseudo-Bedan text, Collectanea or Excerpta et Collectanea, apparently continues the tradition of three kings. The text is said to be from the 8th or 9th century, of Irish origin, and first found in a printed edition of works ascribed (probably incorrectly) to St. Bede the Venerable at Basel in 1563. 


● Fact: The Magi did not visit Jesus on the night He was born.

Regardless of countless “nativity scenes” that place the Magi at the scene of Christ’s birth, it was not so. The sister in Christ mentioned above made this discovery while reading about Matt 2:11, which notes that the Magi met Jesus when He was a “child” living in a “house.” According to Matt 2:16, Jesus may have been as old as age two when these men arrived.

● Fact: The Feast of Epiphany, celebrated by many on January 6th each year to commemorate the Magi's visit, was unknown to the early church.

This feast, along with Christmas as a celebration of the birth of Christ, began much later than the first century. According to the Greek Orthodox Diocese of America, “The celebrations of Epiphany and Christmas, the writing of divine liturgies, the formulation of faith in the Creed, and so many other incidents are permanent foundations which took place during the 4th century and which developed as flowers springing from roots which had existed beforehand.”  


● Fact: Numerous other “holy days,” not mentioned or authorized in the New Testament, have been invented and placed on the so-called “liturgical calendar.”

People who are quite familiar with “Christmas” and “Easter” may not be aware that these are just two examples. For a fuller list see:  


Please take a close look at that list. It’s fascinating. Should Christians today observe - as official church events - these dates? Some are designated for “The Transfiguration,” “Ash Wednesday,” “Lent,” “Presentation of Jesus in the Temple,” "Maundy Thursday," “The Annunciation," etc.

Most evangelical believers reject virtually all these events because they lack biblical authority. They do not observe Ash Wednesday, for example, or the season of Lent which begins on that day. Yet many choose to observe just Christmas and Easter, which originated from the same traditional source as these others.

● Fact: We do not know the date, the month, the season, or even the year of Christ’s birth.

One source notes: “Lacking any scriptural pointers to Jesus’s birthday, early Christian teachers suggested dates all over the calendar. Clement ... picked November 18. Hippolytus ... figured Christ must have been born on a Wednesday ... An anonymous document[,] believed to have been written in North Africa around A.D. 243, placed Jesus’s birth on March 28” (Joseph L. Sheler, U.S. News & World Report, “In Search of Christmas,” Dec. 23, 1996, p. 58).

● Fact: We do know how, when, and why the developing Roman Catholic Church began celebrating Christ’s birth and why their leaders chose December 25.

 “But by the early fourth century, Church leaders decided they needed a Christian alternative to rival popular solstice celebrations. They chose December 25th as the date of Christ’s birth and held the first recorded Feast of the Nativity in Rome in A.D. 336. Whether they did so intentionally or not, Church leaders directly challenged a fellow up-start religion by placing the nativity on December 25th. The Cult of Mithras celebrated the birth of their infant god of light on the very same day.

“Church leaders may have also had theological reasons for choosing the date of Dec. 25th. The Christian historian Sextus Julius Africanus had identified the 25th as Christ’s nativity more than a hundred years earlier. Chronographers reckoned that the world was created on the spring equinox and four days later, on March 25th, light was created. Since the existence of Jesus signaled a beginning of a new era, or new creation, the Biblical chronographers assumed Jesus’ conception would have also fallen on March 25th, placing his birth in December, nine months later.”


Did you catch that? They even set a date for Jesus’ conception – March 25.

● Fact: Protestant leaders such as John Calvin opposed Christmas as an annual official holy day celebrating the birth of Christ.

The Presbyterian Heritage Center notes, “Presbyterians have not always celebrated Christmas. Separating themselves from the Roman Catholic Church practices, Protestant Reformation leaders were generally critical of the existing ‘feast and saint days’ of the Catholic Church.

“The celebration of Christmas became a point of contention among many Protestants. Reformation leader Martin Luther permitted the celebration of certain feast days, including Christmas. Other reformers, including John Calvin and John Knox, preferred to worship only where specifically commanded in the Bible.”


● Fact: Attendance at church assemblies is higher for annual Christmas services than for the “regular” every-Lord’s-Day services throughout the year.

On the one hand, some will say, “Isn’t that great! At least these many people come to church once a year. Perhaps something will be said or done at that time that will cause or encourage them to become disciples of Christ!” Others will say, “We should give the same emphasis to every Lord’s Day, and not perpetuate the notion that December 25 is somehow more holy or special than each Lord's Day throughout the year.”

● Fact: We are taught “as of first importance” that Christ died for our sins, that He was buried, that He rose again, and that He appeared. 1 Cor 15:1-8

Of course His birth is significant and worthy of note! We should never minimize any of the events connected with the coming and life of Christ. There are the prophecies, the virgin birth, the miracles, the Sermon on the Mount, the parables, the Transfiguration, and so much more. We should talk about, sing about, and think about these events often. “Joy to the World” is a powerful hymn any time of the year. Luke 2 is an inspiring passage to study in May as well as December. The fact remains, however, that the first-century church was never taught to have an official observance of any of these other events.

● Fact: There is only one memorial celebration that Jesus specifically instituted.

1 Co 11:23 For I received from the Lord what I also delivered to you, that the Lord Jesus on the night when he was betrayed took bread, 24 and when he had given thanks, he broke it, and said, “This is my body which is for you. Do this in remembrance of me.” 25 In the same way also he took the cup, after supper, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.” 26 For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes.

Many people share the concern that there is more emphasis given to a non-biblical observance – Christmas – than there is given to the one biblical memorial that Jesus did authorize. If we put His specified instructions first we will gather at the Lord's table on the first day of every week. 

It can be noted that, without the birth (and other events), the death could not have occurred. Or that any emphasis on Christ in December, even if it misstates the date of His birth, is better than a purely secular commercial season. We can all be thankful – I certainly am – for the mention of Christ in December.

But the facts remain. It’s the blood that saves. It’s the cross that we commemorate. It’s simply the bread and the cup. No lights. No hype. No glitz. No fanfare.

So, whatever else we do, let’s meet at the table this Lord’s Day. His table. Every Lord’s Day. Because that’s just what He asked us to do.

Monday, October 14, 2013

The Sabbath or the Lord's Day?


Several friends have been talking recently with devout religious folks who believe that the seventh-day Sabbath is the day of Christian worship. Without questioning anyone's sincerity, this post attempts to address various points offered by various "Seventh-Day" proponents. These points are highlighted in gray below.
“God does not change.”
It is true that God's character is forever the same. However, God has in fact changed the practices in which we are to engage. Jesus declared all foods clean (Mark 7:19). Gentiles can become “children of Abraham” without being circumcised (Acts 10; Gal 2-3). Though Mosaic Law called for stoning adulterers (Dt 22:22), Jesus set an adulteress free and told her to sin no more (Jn 8:1-11). Gentile Christians were not required to observe the Passover and the Feast of Unleavened Bread, though these were "forever" items under the Law (Ex 12:14-17).
Principles do not change; practices do. Grace, faith, obedience, worship, sexual purity, etc. are as important as they have ever been. But the administration of these principles has changed.
“Acts 13, 15, 16, 17 and 18 refer to Christian observances of the Sabbath.”
Paul and Barnabas went to the synagogues to proclaim the gospel. None of these Sabbath gatherings was an assembly of Christians, but of Jews and God-fearing Gentiles.
The early church met on the first day of the week to break bread.
Ac 20:7 On the first day of the week, when we were gathered together to break bread, Paul talked with them, intending to depart on the next day, and he prolonged his speech until midnight.
It was during the first-day assembly that Christians gave.

1 Co 16:2 On the first day of every week, each of you is to put something aside and store it up, as he may prosper, so that there will be no collecting when I come.
“The New Testament does not say that the Sabbath has been changed.”
Yes it does, actually. The New Testament declares that the Sabbath was part of the shadow of the reality that is found in Christ.
Col 2:16 Therefore let no one pass judgment on you in questions of food and drink, or with regard to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath. 17 These are a shadow of the things to come, but the substance belongs to Christ.
The New Testament fulfillment of the Sabbath is described in Hebrews 4. As God entered His rest after His six days of work in creation, Christians will enter our “Sabbath rest” in heaven after we finish our “six days” here on earth. The earthly Sabbath was a shadow or facsimile of the true Sabbath rest in heaven.
Heb 4:8 For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not have spoken of another day later on. 9 So then, there remains a Sabbath rest for the people of God, 10 for whoever has entered God’s rest has also rested from his works as God did from his. 11 Let us therefore strive to enter that rest, so that no one may fall by the same sort of disobedience.
So the New Testament teaches that heaven is the fulfillment of the Sabbath. That’s why the church in the New Testament was never commanded to meet for worship on the Sabbath.
“The Catholic Church (not the apostles) changed the day in the fourth century.”
Actually, the significance of the first day of the week is evident in the first century.
In fact, the term “Lord’s Day” (see Rev 1:10) renders the Greek word kyriake. This is the word that the Greeks use still today for the first day of the week. The fact that, in the first century (in Revelation), the word “Lord’s Day” was already used, indicates that the first day of the week was the first-century day of worship for the church.
If the Catholics changed it in the fourth century, how could we find the following statements from the second century?
DIDACHE (AD 90-110): Having earlier confessed your sins so that your sacrifice may be pure, come together each Lord’s day, break bread, and give thanks. (14:1)
IGNATIUS (d. AD 110): If therefore those who lived according to the old practices came to the new hope, no longer observing the Sabbath but living according to the Lord’s day, in which also our life arose through him and his death (which some deny), through which mystery we received faith, and on account of which we suffer in order that we may be found disciples of Jesus Christ our only teacher, how shall we be able to live apart from him for whom even the prophets were looking as their teacher since they were his disciples in the spirit? (Magnesians 9)
PLINY (c. AD 112): [The Christians] affirmed, however, the whole of their guilt, or their error, was, that they were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, hut never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food—but food of an ordinary and innocent kind … (Letters Book X.xcvi, addressed to the Emperor Trajan)
BARNABAS (AD 130): Moreover God says to the Jews, “Your new moons and Sabbaths I cannot endure.” You see how he says, “The present Sabbaths are not acceptable to me, but the Sabbath which I have made in which , when I have rested from all things, I will make the beginning of the eighth day which is the beginning of another world.” Wherefore, we Christians keep the eighth day for joy, on which also Jesus arose from the dead and when he appeared ascended into heaven. (15:8f.)
JUSTIN (AD 150): We are always together with one another. And for all the things with which we are supplied we bless the Maker of all through his Son Jesus Christ and through his Holy Spirit. And on the day called Sunday there is a gathering together in the same place of all who live in a city or a rural district. …We all make our assembly in common on the day of the Sun, since it is the first day, on which God changed the darkness and matter and made the world, and Jesus Christ our Savior arose from the dead on the same day. For they crucified him on the day before Saturn’s day, and on the day after (which is the day of the Sun) he appeared to his apostles and taught his disciples these things. (Apology I, 67:1-3, 7)
JUSTIN (AD 150): There is no other thing for which you blame us, my friends, is there than this’ That we do not live according to the Law, nor are we circumcised in the flesh as your forefathers, nor do we observe the Sabbath as you do. (Dialogue with Trypho 10:1. In verse 3 the Jew Trypho acknowledges that Christians “do not keep the Sabbath.”)
The commandment of circumcision, requiring them always to circumcise the children on the eighth day, was a type of the true circumcision by which we are circumcised from error and evil through the resurrection from the dead on the first day of the week of Jesus Christ our Lord. For the first day of the week, although it is the first of all days, yet according to the number of the days in a cycle is called the eighth (while still remaining the first). (Dialogue 41:4)
JUSTIN (AD 150):
And on the day called Sunday there is a gathering together in the same place of all who live in a city or a rural district. The memoirs of the apostles or the writings of the prophets are read, as long as time permits. Then when the reader ceases, the president in a discourse admonishes and urges the imitation of these good things. Next we all rise together and send up prayers. And, as I said before, when we cease from our prayer, bread is presented and wine and water. The president in the same manner sends up prayers and thanksgivings according to his ability, and the people sing out their assent saying the “Amen.” A distribution and participation of the elements for which thanks have been given is made to each person, and to those who are not present it is sent by the deacons.
Those who have means and are willing, each according to his own choice, gives what he wills, and what is collected is deposited with the president. He provides for the orphans and widows, those who are in want on account of sickness or some other cause, those who are in bonds and strangers who are sojourning, and in a word he becomes the protector of all who are in need. (Apology I, 67)
The Catholics also take credit for producing the Bible! We should not be surprised to see that they claim to have originated other beliefs and practices. As noted earlier, observance of the Lord’s Day is noted frequently by second-century writers. Therefore, the Catholics could not have actually made this change in the fourth century, regardless of their claims.
For further information:
Research the “vision” of Ellen G. White, the Seventh-Day Adventist “prophet,” in which she reportedly saw the central significance of the Sabbath command. Note the following from this website: http://www.bible.ca/7-White-halo.htm.
Ellen G. White wrote under "inspiration" the following:
·                     In "Life Sketches of Ellen G. White," as published by the Adventists, we have this language relating Mrs. White's "vision" of the Sabbath day. "Elder Bates was resting upon Saturday, the seventh day of the week, and he urged it upon our attention as the true Sabbath. I did not feel its importance, and thought that he erred in dwelling upon the fourth commandment more than upon the other nine. But the Lord gave me a view of the heavenly sanctuary. The temple of God was opened in heaven, and I was shown the ark of God covered with the mercy seat. Two angels stood one at either end of the ark with their wings spread over the mercy seat and their faces turned toward it. This, my accompanying angel informed me, represented all the heavenly hosts looking with reverential awe toward the law of God; which had been written by the finger of God. Jesus raised the cover of the ark, and I beheld the tables of stone on which the Ten Commandments were written. I was amazed as I saw the fourth commandment in the very center of the ten precepts with a soft halo of light encircling it. Said the angel, 'It is the only one of the ten which defines the living God who created the heavens and the earth and all things that are there­in."' (Pages 95 and 96.)
·                     Ellen G. White recorded under "inspiration", "In the ark was the golden pot of manna, Aaron's rod that budded, and the tables of stone, which folded together like a book. Jesus opened them, and I saw the Ten Commandments written on them with the finger of God. On one table were Four and on the other six. The four on the first table shone brighter than the other six. But the fourth, the Sabbath commandment, shone above them all; for the Sabbath was set apart to be kept in honor of God's holy name. The holy Sabbath looked glorious ­ a halo of glory was all around it. I SAW THAT THE SABBATH COMMANDMENT WAS NOT NAILED TO THE CROSS. If it was, the other nine commandments were; and we are at liberty to break them all as well as to break the fourth. I saw that God had not changed the Sabbath, for he never changes. But the pope had changed it from the seventh day to the first day of the week; for he was to change times and laws." ("Early Writings of Ellen G. White," page 33.) Again on page 65 of the same book Mrs. White says, "The pope has changed the day of rest from the seventh to the first day."
Research further the early references to the first day of the week as the day of Christian worship. http://www.bible.ca/H-sunday.htm
It was the resurrection of Jesus, not the Catholic Church, that changed the day of worship. Many of His appearances took place on the first day of the week, the church began on the first day of the week, and the disciples gathered to break bread on the first day of the week. No wonder it, and not the Sabbath, is "the Lord's Day."

Monday, September 23, 2013

Transformed Into His Likeness


It is a great blessing when thoughtful Bible students raise questions about God’s Word. It is so uplifting to consider the nature of Jesus’ resurrected body, the nature of Jesus’ current state in heaven, and the type of bodies and existence we will share because of His amazing grace. These are fascinating subjects, worthy of our most careful attention.

Not everyone may agree with every statement that follows. However, here are some topics I have considered, relevant Scriptures I have consulted, and resulting conclusions I have drawn.

1. Jesus’ Body after the Resurrection

Lk 24:36 As they were talking about these things, Jesus himself stood among them, and said to them, “Peace to you!” 37 But they were startled and frightened and thought they saw a spirit. 38 And he said to them, “Why are you troubled, and why do doubts arise in your hearts? 39 See my hands and my feet, that it is I myself. Touch me, and see. For a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see that I have.” 40 And when he had said this, he showed them his hands and his feet. 41 And while they still disbelieved for joy and were marveling, he said to them, “Have you anything here to eat?” 42 They gave him a piece of broiled fish, 43 and he took it and ate before them.

From this passage I conclude that:
[1] Jesus’ physical body, having been crucified and buried, was raised from the dead.
[2] Jesus “himself” stood among His disciples, including John.
[3] This body, after His resurrection, had the hands and feet, and the wound marks, from the crucifixion. It was in fact His body.
[4] This body, after His resurrection, had flesh and bones.
[5] This body, after His resurrection, ate human, physical food, specifically broiled fish. This may indicate that His body was hungry, or at least that He was in fact flesh and bones.

Some think that this was a different body from the body that was crucified, based on the fact that Jesus appeared and disappeared miraculously.

Jn 20:19 On the evening of that day, the first day of the week, the doors being locked where the disciples were for fear of the Jews, Jesus came and stood among them and said to them, “Peace be with you.”
Jn 20:26 Eight days later, his disciples were inside again, and Thomas was with them. Although the doors were locked, Jesus came and stood among them and said, “Peace be with you.” 27 Then he said to Thomas, “Put your finger here, and see my hands; and put out your hand, and place it in my side. Do not disbelieve, but believe.” 28 Thomas answered him, “My Lord and my God!” 29 Jesus said to him, “Have you believed because you have seen me? Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.”

However …
[1] Jesus, even before His resurrection, walked on water. He also appeared “in glory” at the Transfiguration. Such supernatural events, before and after the resurrection, do not require the conclusion that the resurrected body was a different body.
[2] Resurrection, by its very definition, means that something dead is alive again. Jesus’ dead body, His actual, human body, had to be raised for there to be a resurrection.
[3] If Jesus’ actual, human body was not raised (as the “Jehovah’s Witnesses” and others have taught), what happened to that body?
[4] These same passages in John 20 stress that Thomas touched Jesus' actual flesh and confirmed that this was in fact the body that was crucified.

2. Jesus’ Body Now in Heaven

1 Co 15:47 The first man was from the earth, a man of dust; the second man is from heaven. 48 As was the man of dust, so also are those who are of the dust, and as is the man of heaven, so also are those who are of heaven. 49 Just as we have borne the image of the man of dust, we shall also bear the image of the man of heaven. 50 I tell you this, brothers: flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God, nor does the perishable inherit the imperishable.

From this passage I conclude that:
[1] Though Jesus on Earth was flesh and blood, of the dust like Adam, He is in fact now the man of heaven, not the man of dust.
[2] Jesus has gone back from His temporary state (while on Earth) to His eternal state (in Heaven).
[3] Flesh and blood cannot enter heaven.
[4] Jesus’ body, now in Heaven, no longer has flesh and bones.
[5] We must be transformed, as He was, from this earthly state (of dust) into the heavenly state.
[6] Our heavenly bodies will not consist of flesh and bones.

This transformation is further described elsewhere.

Php 3:20 But our citizenship is in heaven, and from it we await a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ, 21 who will transform our lowly body to be like his glorious body, by the power that enables him even to subject all things to himself.

3. Jesus’ Current Heavenly State Yet to be Revealed

1 Jn 3:1 See what kind of love the Father has given to us, that we should be called children of God; and so we are. The reason why the world does not know us is that it did not know him. 2 Beloved, we are God’s children now, and what we will be has not yet appeared; but we know that when he appears we shall be like him, because we shall see him as he is. 3 And everyone who thus hopes in him purifies himself as he is pure.

From this passage I conclude that:
[1] When Jesus appears again we shall see Him as He is now.
[2] Neither John nor the other witnesses of Jesus’ resurrection had yet seen Him as He is now.
[3] Therefore, what He is now is not the same as what He was when they saw Him after His resurrection.
[4] Jesus, after His resurrection, was not yet fully glorified into His current heavenly state.
[5] Since His ascension and enthronement Jesus has been fully glorified and is no longer flesh and bones.

4. Our Raised, Transformed State When He Returns

1 Co 15:35 But someone will ask, “How are the dead raised? With what kind of body do they come?” 36 You foolish person! What you sow does not come to life unless it dies. 37 And what you sow is not the body that is to be, but a bare kernel, perhaps of wheat or of some other grain. 38 But God gives it a body as he has chosen, and to each kind of seed its own body. 39 For not all flesh is the same, but there is one kind for humans, another for animals, another for birds, and another for fish. 40 There are heavenly bodies and earthly bodies, but the glory of the heavenly is of one kind, and the glory of the earthly is of another. 41 There is one glory of the sun, and another glory of the moon, and another glory of the stars; for star differs from star in glory. 42 So is it with the resurrection of the dead. What is sown is perishable; what is raised is imperishable. 43 It is sown in dishonor; it is raised in glory. It is sown in weakness; it is raised in power. 44 It is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body. If there is a natural body, there is also a spiritual body.

1 Co 15:50 I tell you this, brothers: flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God, nor does the perishable inherit the imperishable. 51 Behold! I tell you a mystery. We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed, 52 in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, and the dead will be raised imperishable, and we shall be changed. 53 For this perishable body must put on the imperishable, and this mortal body must put on immortality.

From this passage I conclude that:
[1] When Paul was asked, “What kind of body …?” he implied that such a heavenly, fully glorified body had not yet been seen. He could have answered, “Of course, our bodies will be like Jesus was after the resurrection, with flesh and bones, eating broiled fish.” He did not. Instead he said, “You foolish person!” and did not use the resurrected, physical, human body of Jesus in his response.
[2] Our bodies must (and will) be raised and transformed from their current state (of dust, of Adam) into their heavenly state (of heaven, of Christ).
[3] This is what happened to Jesus Himself. He was raised and (later) was fully transformed and glorified.
[4] What was gradual for Jesus will be instant for us. “In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye …” When He returns, our bodies will be raised and transformed into His likeness.
[5] We, like Jesus in His current heavenly state, will no longer be flesh and bones.
[6] In our transformed, glorified state, we will inherit the kingdom of heaven.

Ultimately, on this we can all agree. We want to be like Jesus Christ! And we will be! That final transformation, which we anticipate with joy, provides the motivation we need today to become more and more like Him. As the Scripture says:

1 Jn 3:3 And everyone who thus hopes in him purifies himself as he is pure.

To comment and/or to receive notices of future blog posts, please email cory247 [AT symbol] gmx [dot com]. God bless.


Sunday, September 08, 2013

America’s Godly Heritage


By way of introduction, you may want to read Psalm 33:8-22.
Our lives are filled with symbols.
Visitors from greater Philadelphia (where we once lived) gave me a paperweight with miniature replicas of the Liberty Bell (FREEDOM), Constitution Hall (LAW), and the Betsy Ross House (LOYALTY). On the bottom of the paperweight was another symbol: “MADE IN CHINA!”
Today an increasingly secular society refers to those who believe the Bible as the “Religious Right.” BUT WE HAVE NOT MOVED! The evidence of America's godly heritage is all around us.

You can hear it in our songs:
Katharine Lee Bates wrote: “America! America! God shed His grace on thee and crown thy good with brotherhood from sea to shining sea!”
And, though you may never have heard it, this is the last stanza of our National Anthem, “The Star-Spangled Banner:”
“Blessed with victory and peace, may this Heav’n-rescued land Praise the Power that hath made and preserved us a nation! Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just; And this be our motto: ‘In God is our trust!’ And the star-spangled banner in triumph shall wave O’er the land of the free, and the home of the brave.”
You can see it on our money:
“Every coin minted in the United States bears, along with a bust of a past hero, these words: LIBERTY -- IN GOD WE TRUST. It was not lightly that our forefathers chose these inseparable words, for they knew the tremendous cost and sacrifice that had been paid to secure our freedom. In gratitude, they continually acknowledged that God had made and preserved our nation. They were confident that God was blessing their endeavors because they acknowledged Him and sought His aid in all their doings. They warned future generations that the day God was not earnestly revered in America, she would become a byword among nations (p. 12).”
In 1776, our forefathers not only declared their indepen­dence from an earthly power; they also declared their depen­dence upon Almighty God. The closing words of the Declara­tion of Independence state: “With a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.”
They sought freedom, not from God, but under God. Their ideal was freedom of religion, not freedom from religion. And they were willing to pay the ultimate price for it.
Speaking of this freedom, Thomas Payne wrote in 1776: “What we obtain too cheaply, we esteem too lightly; it is dearness only that gives everything its value. Heaven knows how to put a price upon its goods, and it would be strange indeed if so celes­tial an article as freedom should not be highly rated.”
The American system was to be the political expression of Christian ideas. Our forefathers constantly reaffirmed the need and role of God in the United States government.
You can hear it from the lips of early American leaders:
Benjamin Franklin, 1787: “God governs in the affairs of man. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without His aid? We have been assured, Sir, in the Sacred Writings that except the Lord build the house, they labor in vain that build it. I firmly believe this ... I therefore move that, henceforth, prayers imploring the assistance of Heaven and its blessing on our deliberation be held in this assembly every morning.”
Those daily prayers continue to be offered even at the present time.
George Washing­ton, in his inaugural address to Congress: “No people can be bound to acknowledge and adore the invisible hand which conducts the affairs of men more than the people of the United States. Every step by which they have advanced to the character of an independent nation seems to have been dis­tinguished by some token of providential agency ... We ought to be no less persuaded that the propitious smiles of heaven cannot be expected on a nation that disregards the eternal rules of order and right, which heaven itself has ordained.”
First Thanksgiving Proc’m: duty to acknowledge, obey, thank, implore.
US Capitol Bldg – room for prayer for members of Congress; focal point is a stained glass window showing Washington kneeling in prayer. Behind him are etched the words of Psalm 16:1 – “Preserve me, O God, for in Thee do I put my trust.”
Abraham Lincoln: “It is the duty of nations, as well as of men, to own their dependence upon the overruling power of God and to recognize the sublime truth announced in the Holy Scriptures and proven by all history, that those nations only are blessed whose God is the Lord.”
Calvin Coolidge: “The foundations of our society and our government rest so much on the teachings of the Bible that it would be difficult to support them if faith in these teachings would cease to be practically universal in our country.”
Thomas Jefferson’s words etched in stone at the Jefferson Memorial in Washing­ton: “God who gave us life gave us liberty. Can the liber­ties of a nation be secure when we have removed a conviction that these liberties are the gift of God? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, that His justice cannot sleep forever.”
“When America Cried for Bibles” -- Because of the American Revolution, England stopped supplying Bibles to America. Patrick Allison, chaplain of Congress, placed before that body in 1777 a petition urging immediate relief. A special committee considered the problem and reported: “... that the use of the Bible is so universal and its importance so great that your committee refer the above to the consideration of Congress, and if Congress shall not think it expedient to order the importation of types and paper, the Committee recommend that Congress will order the Committee of Congress to import 20,000 Bibles from Holland, Scotland, or elsewhere, into the different parts of the States of the Union. Whereupon it was resolved accordingly to direct said Committee to import 20,000 copies of the Bible.” In 1780 the need arose once more. Robert Aitken, who had set up in Philadelphia as a bookseller and publisher of The Pennsylvania Magazine, saw the need and petitioned Congress. In response, Congress actually commissioned and approved a special printing of Bibles!
Listen to the words of Daniel Webster, who in 1851 wrote: “Let the religious element in man’s nature be neglected, let him be influenced by no higher motives than self-interest, and subjected to no stronger restraint than the limits of civil authority, and he becomes the creature of selfish passion or blind fanaticism. On the other hand, the cultiva­tion of the religious sentiment represses licentiousness ... inspires respect for law and order, and gives strength to the whole social fabric, at the same time that it conducts the human soul upward to the Author of its being.”
Religious principle >> moral habits >> security of gov’t and people.
You can hear it from the mouths of foreigners:
More than 100 years after Webster, Charles Malik, one-time Ambassador to the United States from Lebanon, put it this way: “The good (in the United States) would never have come into being without the blessing and the power of Jesus Christ ... I know how embarrassing this matter is to politi­cians, bureaucrats, businessmen and cynics: but, whatever these honored men think, the irrefutable truth is that the soul of America is at its best and highest, Christian.”
You can even see it in writing from the United States Su­preme Court:
All of us are familiar with modern Supreme Court decisions banning school prayer, authorizing abortion, and increasing­ly limiting or even denying our free speech rights as Chris­tians.
But let me read you another Supreme Court Decision you may have never encountered before.
 “Our laws and our institutions must necessarily be based upon and embody the teachings of The Redeemer of mankind. It is impossible that it should be otherwise; and in this sense and to this extent our civilization and our institutions are emphatically Christian ... This is a religious people. This is historically true. From the discovery of this continent to the present hour, there is a single voice making this affirmation ... we find every­where a clear recognition of the same truth ... These, and many other matters which might be noticed, add a volume of unofficial declarations to the mass of organic utterances that this is a Christian nation.” Supreme Court Decision, 1892. Church of the Holy Trinity V. United States.
Would you believe this ... Inside the Supreme Court building today, above the head of the Chief Justice, are the Ten Command­ments, with the great American eagle protecting them. In a marble sculpture group on the east front of the build­ing, Moses himself is seen, holding the tablets of stone with the Ten Commandments written on them in Hebrew! That alone should tell us that the Supreme Court was originally instituted to operate only within the parameters and limita­tions imposed by Scripture.
There was the assumption and consensus that the government was not to issue judgment in areas where God had already done so in Scripture. For example, divorce and remarriage. On one occasion, the Supreme Court would not even put forth an opinion, because it was seen as settled by the Bible.
Hear Daniel Webster again: “Lastly, our ancestors established their system of government on morality and religious sentiment. Moral habits, they believed, cannot safely be trusted on any other foundation than religious principle, nor any government be secure which is not supported by moral habits.”
Note that! According to Webster, the security of a government depends upon moral habits. And moral habits cannot be sustained by any other foundation than religious principle!
Textbooks used in our nation’s public schools were basically all built on Scripture. Verses from the Bible were used for memory work and even for practicing the letters of the alphabet. The Lord’s Prayer and the Ten Commandments were recited, and Bible study was a regular element in the classroom. If you were to read some of the material, you would think it was taken straight from a Sunday School class. By the way, the main problems the teachers had then were not with children handling guns and knives and drugs; they were with children chewing gum and forgetting to whisper in the halls.
You can hear it in our early government assemblies:
Prayers in all government assemblies. Hear these words from Benjamin Franklin, spoken in the summer of 1787 in Philadelphia at the Constitutional Convention. When the delegates met with serious disagreements with each other, and they were about to adjourn in confusion, the eighty-one-year-old Franklin rose and said:
“In the beginning of the contest with Britain, when we were sensible of danger, we had daily prayers in this room for Divine protection. Our prayers, Sir, were heard and they were graciously answered. All of us who were engaged in the struggle must have observed frequent instances of a super-intending Providence in our favor ... Have we now forgotten this powerful Friend? Or do we imagine that we no longer need His assistance? I have lived, Sir, a long time, and the longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this truth: that God governs in the affairs of man. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without His aid? We have been assured, Sir, in the Sacred Writings that except the Lord build the house, they labor in vain that build it. I firmly believe this ... I therefore beg leave to move that, henceforth, prayers imploring the assistance of Heaven and its blessing on our deliberation be held in this assembly every morning.”
You can see it in our early documents such as our state charters:
The very purpose of the Pilgrims in 1620 was to establish a government based on the Bible. The New England Charter, signed by King James I, states as the goal: “... to advance the enlargement of Christian religion, to the glory of God Almighty ...”
The Rhode Island Charter of 1683 begins: “We submit our persons, lives and estates unto our Lord Jesus Christ, the King of kings and Lord of lords and to all those perfect and most absolute laws of His given us in His Holy Word.”
Notice that our fathers saw this new society, not as a democracy based on the majority vote and the changing whims of sinful human beings, but as a republic to be governed by the absolute laws given in the Bible.
You can hear it from our early U.S. Presidents:
What about the early U.S. Presidents? Hear George Washington, in his inaugural address to Congress: “No people can be bound to acknowledge and adore the invisible hand which conducts the affairs of men more than the people of the United States. Every step by which they have advanced to the character of an independent nation seems to have been distinguished by some token of providential agency ... We ought to be no less persuaded that the propitious smiles of heaven cannot be expected on a nation that disregards the eternal rules of order and right, which heaven itself has ordained.”
Washington issued the first Thanksgiving Proclamation, which reads: “Whereas it is the duty of all nations to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God, to obey his will, to be grateful for his benefits, and humbly implore His protection and favor ...” It goes on to call the nation to thankfulness to Almighty God.

Psalm 16:1 – In the U.S. Capitol

A reminder of Washington’s faith is found today in the U.S. Capitol building. In the Capitol is a small room set aside for the private prayer and meditation of members of Congress. The room’s focal point is a stained glass window showing George Washington kneeling in prayer. Behind him are etched these words from Psalm 16:1: “Preserve me, O God, for in Thee do I put my trust.”
Abraham Lincoln: “It is the duty of nations, as well as of men, to own their dependence upon the overruling power of God and to recognize the sublime truth announced in the Holy Scriptures and proven by all history, that those nations only are blessed whose God is the Lord.”
Lincoln again, regarding the Bible: “All the good from the Saviour of the world is communicated through this Book; but for the Book we could not know right from wrong. All the things desirable to man are contained in it.”
Have you ever visited the Lincoln Memorial in Washington? I have. It is massive and impressive. Engraved in the walls are words spoken by Lincoln himself which represent his view. Things like this: “And this Nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom.” At the opposite end, on the north wall, his Second Inaugural Address alludes to “God,” the “Bible,” “providence,” “the Almighty,” and “divine attributes.”
It then continues: “As was said 3000 years ago, so it still must be said, ‘The judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether (from Psalm 19:9).’”
Woodrow Wilson: “... the Bible ... is the one supreme source of revelation of the meaning of life, the nature of God and spiritual nature and need of men. It is the only guide of life which really leads the spirit in the way of peace and salvation.”
Andrew Jackson: “Go to the Scriptures ... the joyful promises it contains will be a balsam to all your troubles.”
Calvin Coolidge: “The foundations of our society and our government rest so much on the teachings of the Bible that it would be difficult to support them if faith in these teachings would cease to be practically universal in our country.”
Even Thomas Jefferson’s statement about the “Separation of church and state” was intended, not to keep God out of government, but to keep the government from sticking its nose into religion. It was to protect the church from the government, not to protect the government from the church, that this idea was put forward.
It was our fathers’ concern that the government not force any one denomination on anyone. Not show favor to any group over another, as long as these groups all professed to follow Jesus Christ. It was their intent instead that, with a nation based on faith in God, Jesus Christ and the Bible, each individual would be free to worship and serve according to his own beliefs and conscience.
How can I be so sure that Jefferson did not intend to keep faith in God out of the government? Because of the other things Jefferson wrote. For exam­ple, consider these words of his, etched in stone at the Jefferson Memorial in Washing­ton: “God who gave us life gave us liberty. Can the liber­ties of a nation be secure when we have removed a conviction that these liberties are the gift of God? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, that His justice cannot sleep forever.”
You can read it in stone in our government buildings:
* A portrait of Moses with the Ten Commandments hangs above the Speaker’s chair in the United States Congress.
* The Library of Congress (another government institution) has statues of the apostle Paul and Moses, and it has large inscriptions of Micah 6:8 and Psalm 19:1 prominently displayed.
* The Lincoln Memorial has chiseled on it, “The judgments of the Lord are righteous.” (Government Property) – Ps 19:8

* The Tomb of the Unknown Soldier is dedicated to a soldier “Known but to God.”

* There is a prayer room in Congress.
* The very branch of our US Government which ruled against prayers at a high school football game opens the Supreme Court Session with the words, “God save the United States and this honorable court.” They do this publicly, not privately.
* The United States Constitution refers to Jesus, stating the Constitution was signed in 1787 “in the year of our Lord.”
You can see it in the early colleges our fathers established:
It may surprise many people to realize that almost every Ivy League school was established primarily to train ministers of the gospel -- and to evangelize the Atlantic seaboard.
Harvard, founded in 1638. From Harvard’s “Rules and Precepts” adopted in 1646: “Every one shall consider the main end of his life and studies to know God and Jesus Christ which is eternal life. Seeing the Lord giveth wisdom, every one shall seriously by prayer in secret seek wisdom of Him. Every one shall so exercise himself in reading the Scriptures twice a day that they be ready to give an account of their proficiency therein, both in theoretical observations of languages and logic, and in practical and spiritual truths ...”
In fact, 52% of Harvard’s graduates in the 17th century became ministers!
Similarly:
Yale, 1701.
Princeton, 1746.
Dartmouth, 1754.
Columbia University
William and Mary
And many others
CONCLUSION
Noah Webster was right when he said: “The moral principles and precepts contained in the Scriptures ought to form the basis of all our civil constitutions and laws. All the miseries and evils which men suffer from vice, crime, ambi­tion, injustice, oppression, slavery, and war, proceed from their despising or neglecting the precepts contained in the Bible.”
His words now appear prophetic. For it is exactly because God and the Bible have been abandoned by our culture that we are now seeing such immense moral collapse.
SCRIPTURES AT NATIONAL MONUMENTS
Lev 25:10 – On the Liberty Bell
Proclaim liberty throughout the land.
There is a copy of the Liberty Bell in every one of our 50 state capitals.

Psalm 16:1 – In the U.S. Capitol

A reminder of Washington’s faith is found today in the U.S. Capitol building. In the Capitol is a small room set aside for the private prayer and meditation of members of Con­gress. The room’s focal point is a stained glass window showing George Washington kneeling in prayer. Behind him are etched these words from Psalm 16:1: “Preserve me, O God, for in Thee do I put my trust.”

Psalm 19:9 – At the Lincoln Memorial

The Lincoln Memorial in Washington – It is massive and impressive. Engraved in the walls are words spoken by Lincoln himself which represent his view. Things like this: “And this Nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom.” At the opposite end, on the north wall, his Second Inaugural Address alludes to “God,” the “Bible,” “providence,” “the Almighty,” and “divine attributes.”
It then continues: “As was said 3000 years ago, so it still must be said, ‘The judgments of the Lord are true and righ­teous altogether (from Psalm 19:9).’”

Micah 6:8 and Psalm 19:1 – In the Library of Congress

The Library of Congress has statues of the apostle Paul and Moses, and it has large inscriptions of Micah 6:8 and Psalm 19:1 prominently displayed.
Micah 6:8
He has showed you, O man, what is good. And what does the LORD require of you? To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God. 
Psalm 19:1
The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands.

Collected from multiple sources. Edited by Cory Collins.