Could it be that evils involving men do not indicate the presence of real masculinity, but rather the
absence of it? Is it possible that wicked men are not actually manly men at all? Is there a real danger
that, as society seeks to weaken, soften, feminize, silence, and intimidate men,
our culture may forget what it means to be truly masculine?
Some of you know that I have been thinking about and discussing what it
means to be a “first-class MALE.” In keeping with this I preached recently on
gender and gender roles in the home and the church. The next day I came across
a fascinating post. Allie Beth Stuckey, Host of “Allie” on CRTV and the
“Relatable” podcast, works with Prager University and describes herself as a “conservative
millennial.”
In this message and in her video, she explains why demonizing masculinity
is not the solution, but the problem.
The words that follow are hers.
----------
Rape, murder, war—they all have one thing in common: Men.
Aggression, violence, ambition unchecked by conscience—all the stuff of
“toxic masculinity,” right?
And, the solution is obvious: make men less toxic.
Make men less masculine.
Make men more like women.
But I’m here to tell you that this way of thinking is not only wrong,
it’s dangerous.
Here’s why: When you try to make men more like women, you don’t get less
“toxic masculinity,” you get more.
Why? Because bad men don’t become good when they stop being men; they
become good when they stop being bad. Aggression, violence, and unbridled
ambition can’t be eliminated from the male psyche; they can only be harnessed.
And when they are harnessed, they are tools for good, not for harm.
The same masculine traits that bring destruction also defeat tyranny. The
traits that foster greed also build economies. The traits that drive men to
take foolish risks also drive men to take heroic risks.
The answer to toxic masculinity isn’t less masculinity; it’s better
masculinity. And we know what that looks like.
It’s a young man opening the door for a girl on their first date. It’s a
father working long hours to provide for his family. It’s a soldier risking his
life to defend his country.
The growing problem in today’s society isn’t that men are too masculine;
it’s that they’re not masculine enough. When men embrace their masculinity in a
way that is healthy and productive, they are leaders, warriors and heroes. When
they deny their masculinity, they run away from responsibilities, leaving
destruction and despair in their wake.
The consequences can be seen everywhere.
One in four fathers now lives apart from his children. And children who
grow up without a dad are generally more depressed than their peers who have a
mother and a father. They are at far greater risk for incarceration, teen
pregnancy and poverty. Seventy-one percent of high school dropouts are
fatherless.
“Of all the rocks upon which we build our lives…family is the most
important. And we are called to recognize and honor how critical every father
is to that foundation.”
That was said by then-Senator Barack Obama in 2008.
“If we are honest with ourselves,” he went on, “we’ll admit that…too many
fathers are…missing from too many lives and too many homes.”
As much as we try to deny the need for real, masculine strength in
society, there’s no denying its necessity. Healthy families and strong
communities depend on the leadership and bravery of good men.
Yet, the current trend is to feminize young men in the hopes of achieving
some utopian notion of equality and peace. And it starts at the earliest ages.
In the school classroom, boys are invariably “the problem.” On the playground,
aggressive games like dodgeball have long been banished. We tell young men that
their intrinsic desire to compete is wrong. Everybody gets a trophy. Don’t run
up the score. This anti-male tilt continues on through higher education and
into the workplace. It has created millions of tentative men, unhappy women,
and confused boys and girls.
Here’s a secret that every woman knows: Women want real men—men they can
count on and, yes, look up to. No amount of feminist theory will change that. I
don’t know any woman, at any age, who is attracted to a passive man who looks
to her to be his provider, protector and leader. Every woman I know wants a
strong, responsible man. That’s not a consequence of a social construct or
cultural pressure—it’s innate.
The devaluation of masculinity won’t end well because feminine, passive
men don’t stop evil. Passive men don’t defend, protect or provide. Passive men
don’t lead. Passive men don’t do the things we have always needed men to do for
society to thrive.
In his book, The Abolition of Man, English social philosopher
C.S. Lewis writes about this problem. He describes the tension “between
cerebral man and visceral man.” “By his intellect,” Lewis explains, man “is
mere spirit and by his appetite mere animal.”
We need both. Take away one, and you’re left with a man who’s either weak
or wicked. And in a world of wickedness, weak men are nothing more than enablers
of wicked men.
Rape, murder, war—they all have two things in common:
bad men who do the raping, murdering, and warring; and weak men who won’t stop
them. We need good men who will.
It’s not masculinity that’s toxic. It’s the lack of it.
I’m Allie Stuckey for Prager University.
----------
Here’s a link to this same message as she presents it in her YouTube
video. It is well worth watching and sharing.
